<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Datomic Knowledgebase - Recent questions tagged valcache</title>
<link>https://ask.datomic.com/index.php/tag/valcache</link>
<description>Powered by Question2Answer</description>
<item>
<title>Using Valcache via Docker bind mounts</title>
<link>https://ask.datomic.com/index.php/1012/using-valcache-via-docker-bind-mounts</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I'm evaluating caching options for Datomic Pro. Valcache sounds like a great fit, but there is one thing that might be a showstopper.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;https://docs.datomic.com/pro/operation/valcache.html#prerequisites&quot;&gt;Prerequisites docs&lt;/a&gt; says that &quot;Valcache relies on an SSD with the strictatime and lazytime flags set&quot;. This requirement I can meet pretty easily by remounting the disk on the hosts running the peers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, the applications that are Datomic peers, who would be the users of these Valcaches, run as Docker containers in a Docker Swarm. The idea is to mount the Valcache as a &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;https://docs.docker.com/storage/bind-mounts/&quot;&gt;Docker bind mount&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would this work? The underlaying SSD disk would be mounted with strictatime and lazytime, but would whatever mechanism that requires these flags to be set work through a Docker bind mount?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>On-Prem</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://ask.datomic.com/index.php/1012/using-valcache-via-docker-bind-mounts</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 09:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>